In an extraordinary move, the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) has cancelled the candidature of trainee Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer Puja Manorama Dilip Khedkar. This action stems from her violations of the examination rules for the 2022 Civil Services Examination (CSE), as she was found to have appeared for the exam more times than allowed. The UPSC’s stringent enforcement of its regulations highlights the significance of integrity and transparency in the selection process for one of India’s most prestigious civil services.
Khedkar’s case surfaced when the UPSC issued her a show-cause notice on July 18, accusing her of “fraudulently availing attempts beyond the permissible limit provided for in the Examination Rules by faking her identity.” The notice was a result of the Commission’s careful scrutiny of candidate records, which revealed contradictions in Khedkar’s examination attempts. She was initially asked to respond to the notice by July 25 but requested an extension until August 4. The UPSC granted her time until 3:30 PM on July 30 to submit her explanation.
Despite the granted extension, Khedkar failed to provide a satisfactory response within the prescribed timeframe. As a result, the UPSC concluded that she had violated the CSE-2022 rules by exceeding the permissible number of attempts through deceitful means. This led to the cancellation of her provisional candidature and a permanent ban from all future UPSC examinations and selections.
The UPSC’s rules for the Civil Services Examination are designed to ensure fairness and equal opportunity for all aspirants. Candidates from the General category are allowed a maximum of six attempts, while OBC candidates have nine attempts, and there is no restriction for SC/ST candidates. These rules are clearly stated in the examination guidelines and are intended to maintain a level playing field.
Khedkar’s case focuses a serious issue regarding identity verification and the potential for fraudulent practices. By allegedly faking her identity, Khedkar exploited the system, undermining the integrity of the examination process. The UPSC’s decision to bar her permanently serves as a stern warning to other aspirants about the consequences of attempting to manipulate the system.This move is likely to have several far-reaching implications:First, by taking decisive action against rule violators, the UPSC underpins the importance of adhering to examination guidelines. This ensures that all candidates have an equal and fair chance at success, preserving the integrity of the selection process.Second, Khedkar’s permanent debarment serves as a strong deterrent to other aspirants who might consider circumventing the rules. The message is clear, any attempt to deceive the system will result in severe consequences.Third, the UPSC’s proactive stance in addressing fraudulent practices helps maintain public trust in the examination process. It reassures the public that the commission is vigilant and committed to upholding the highest standards of transparency and fairness.Lastly, this incident may prompt the UPSC to review and enhance its identity verification mechanisms. Improved technology and stricter verification processes could be implemented to prevent similar cases in the future.
The cancellation of Puja Manorama Dilip Khedkar’s candidature and her permanent debarment from UPSC examinations underscore the critical importance of integrity in the Civil Services Examination process. The UPSC’s resolute action reinforces the core values of fairness, transparency, and equal opportunity, which are essential for maintaining the high standards expected of India’s civil servants.
The path to becoming an IAS officer is rigorous and demands the highest levels of honesty and dedication. This incident serves as a mighty reminder that any deviation from these principles will not be tolerated, ensuring that only the most deserving and ethical candidates are selected to serve the nation.
(The views expressed above are the author’s own. Kashmir Patriot is not responsible for the same.)
Comments are closed.